Protein MarkersTissue Cypher Features
p53, p16, AMACR Loss of tumor suppression and cell cycle control
CD68, COX2Immune and inflammatory markers
HER-2, CK20 Cancer growth and cell transformation
HIF1alpha, CD45RO Angiogenesis and memory lymphocyte infiltration
Protein MarkersProtein Function
p53p53 nuclear sum intensity
p53p53 nuclear mean intensity
HER2/neu and K20 Ratio of mean HER2/neu intensity:mean K20 intensity in nuclei clusters
HER2/neu and K20 Ratio of 95th quantile HER2/neu intensity:95th quantile K20 intensity in nuclei clusters
COX-2 and CD68Coexpression cellular COX2 mean intensity and cellular CD68, mean intensity
p53p53 mean intensity in nuclei clusters
p53, p16 and nuclear morphology (solidity) Nuclear solidity in p53+ p16- cells
CD45RO CD45RO plasma membrane sum intensity
AMACRAMACR microenvironment SD
COX2COX-2 texture in cytoplasm
HIF1α HIF1α microenvironment cell mean intensity
HIF1αHIF1α microenvironment cell moment (product of mean and standard deviation)
p16p16 cytoplasm mean intensity
p53, p16 and nuclear morphology (area) Nuclear area in p53+ p16- cells
Nuclear morphology Hoechst nuclear 95th quantile intensity
Dysplasia grading 5-year risk (progression to high-grade dysplasia or cancer) Frequency of surveillance
Non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus 3.15% 3-5 years depending on segment length
Indefinite for dysplasia (with controlled reflux) 7.5%1-year surveillance
Low-grade dysplasia8.5%6-12-month surveillance or treatment with EET
Other GEP tests
Identifies patient risk for nodal metastasis
Provides personalized risk for sentinel lymph node positivity x
Provides personalized risk of recurrence including MSS, RFS, and DMFSx
Data demonstrates independent, significant risk stratification provided by GEP result compared to AJCC stage x
Data demonstrates improved patient survival associated with testing x
GEP Test True Negative: False Negative Ratio False-Negative Rate Reference
CP-GEP
T1-T2 12:1 7.9% Mulder, et al. 2020
T1-T2 27:1 3.5%Johansson, et al. 2021
T1-T2 15:16.3%Yousaf, et al. 2021
T1-T2 27:13.5%Stassen, et al. 2023
T1-T2 14:16.8%Sondak, et al. 2024
CP-GEP T1-T2 Overall15:1 6.2%
31-GEP/ i31-SLNB
T1-T2 (31-GEP)34:1 3.0%Yamamoto, et al. 2023
T1-T2 (i31-SLNB)b 25:1 3.9% Whitman, et al. 2021
T1-T2 (i31-SLNB) 30:00%Kriza, et al. 2024
T1-T2a (i31-SLNB) 58:00%Beard, et al. 2024
31-GEP/ i31-SLNB T1-T2 Overall 34:1 2.8%
StudyDesignResults3-year follow-up5-year follow-up
Onken et al., 2012. Ophthalmology (COOG)Prospective multi-center, n=446

Class 1A

Class 1B

Class 2

3-Year MFS
98%
93%
50%

5-Year MFS
98%
93%
50%

Chappell et al., 2012. Amer J Ophthalmol.Retrospective single-center, n=197

Class 1

Class 2

5-Year DSS
93%
38%

Correa & Augsburger, 2016. Am J Ophthalmol.Prospective single-center n=299

Class 1

Class 2

5-Year MFS
97%
55%

Plasseraud et al., 2016. J Oncol.Prospective multi-center, n=70

Class 1

Class 2

3-Year MFS
100%
63%

Demirci et al., 2018. Am J Ophthalmol.Prospective single-center, n=293

Class 1A

Class 1B

Class 2

3-Year MFS
99%
90%
60%

Aaberg et al., 2020. Ocul Oncol Pathol.Prospective multi-center, n=89

Class 1A

Class 1B

Class 2

5-Year MFS
90%
41%

Binkley et al., 2020. Ophthalmol Retina.Retrospective, 2-center, n=215

Class 1

Class 2

3-Year MFS
96%
63%

5-Year MFS
96%
49%

Wong et al., 2022. J Contemp BrachytherapyRetrospective, single-center, n=180

Class 1A

Class 1B

Class 2

5-Year MFS
98%
100%
42%

Singh et al., 2022. JAMA Ophthalmol.Retrospective, 2-center n=347

Class 1

Class 2

3 -Year MFS
93%
67%

5-Year MFS
87%
47%