The leader 
in prognostic melanoma testing

Guide your melanoma management with the most clinically validated and comprehensive GEP test on the market.

Clinically validated in the largest real-world study of GEP testing in melanoma

   

Recent data from an ongoing collaboration with the National Cancer Institute’s (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program Registries show that testing with DecisionDx-Melanoma was associated with lower melanoma-specific and overall mortality relative to untested patients. In the study, DecisionDx-Melanoma provided significant and independent risk stratification of patients with cutaneous melanoma, beyond American Joint Committee on Cancer Eighth Edition (AJCC8) stage, which may help inform more personalized patient management decisions.3

29% Lower 3-year melanoma-specific mortality rate in patients clinically tested vs. untested 17% Lower 3-year overall mortality rate in patients clinically tested vs. untested

Clinically proven to improve outcomes

A recent independent, multi-center study of SLN negative patients explored the utility of routine imaging to detect metastases in patients with a negative sentinel lymph node biopsy but high risk DecisionDx-Melanoma results. This retrospective analysis of clinically tested patients was performed at 3 NCI-designated cancer centers (Northwestern University, Cleveland Clinic, and Oregon Health & Science University), and included patients with confirmed melanoma diagnosis and negative SLNB.

The experimental group (n=307) included the high risk DecisionDx-Melanoma patients, and physicians used the results to guide their melanoma management. The control group (n=327) consisted of patients who did not receive DecisionDx-Melanoma testing, and their management was based on symptoms or exam findings. 

The conclusion? Patients who received routine imaging after high-risk GEP test scores had an earlier recurrence diagnosis with lower tumor burden, which was associated with better clinical outcomes.4

Not all GEP tests are created equal

The value of a test is driven by the value of information it provides. DecisionDx-Melanoma has continued to show that it offers data that is above and beyond what traditional staging can provide. 

Other GEP tests
Identifies patient risk for nodal metastasis
Provides personalized risk for sentinel lymph node positivity x
Provides personalized risk of recurrence including MSS, RFS, and DMFS x
Data demonstrates independent, significant risk stratification provided by GEP result compared to AJCC stage x
Data demonstrates improved patient survival associated with testing x

Hear from an expert: How Mark Gimbel, MD uses DecisionDx-Melanoma to personalize care

  • Dr. Gimbel, a surgical oncologist specializing in melanoma, discusses how he integrates DecisionDx-Melanoma into his daily practice. Watch the video to see how an expert uses this powerful prognostic tool to guide treatment decisions and enhance patient care at every step in their journey.

Castle Biosciences: The leader in melanoma prognostic testing leader with independent, robust validation and real-world results

i31-Precision

validated AI-driven algorithms integrating 31-GEP with patient-specific clinicopathologic factors

50+

peer-reviewed, pubished studies including prospective studies and two meta-analyses

>10,000

patients studied including independent validation

150,000+

patients with a clinical DecisionDx-Melanoma order from ~13,000 clinicians

50%

demonstrated clinical utility providing change in management for one of two patients tested

Medicare+

covered by Medicare and multiple private insurers with an industry-leading patient assistance program

*Numbers as of February 2024

Ready to enhance your decision making and improve patient outcomes?

References

  1. Guenther, JM, et al. Society of Surgical Oncology SSO 2024 Annual Meeting. Ann Surg Oncol. 31 (Suppl 1), S32 (2024).
  2. Jarell, et al. JAAD. 2022.
  3. Bailey et al. JCO PO. 2023
  4. Dhillon et al., Archives of Derm Research. 2023.
  5. Yamamoto et al, CMRO. 2023.