

The Castle story
Our story is simple. Our science is complex. From the beginning, Castle Biosciences was driven by a desire to help patients receive the best care possible. Our founder believed that the traditional methods to determine cancer patients' prognoses could be improved by harnessing the biology of their tumors. Through this belief, Castle was born.
.b16c3851.png)

Who we are
We are an innovator in proprietary laboratory-developed tests, which provide personalized, clinically actionable information that can help healthcare providers and patients make more informed disease management decisions.
Our mission
Improving health through innovative tests that guide patient care
Our vision
To transform disease management by keeping people first: patients, clinicians, employees and investors
Our history
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV
Validation of the neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic factors with the 31-GEP class score for personalized SLNB positivity risk assessment.
- Of all factors, the 31-GEP was the most predictive of a positive SLN
- The i31-SLNB algorithm reclassified 63% of patients with T1 tumors, originally classified with a 5-10% likelihood of SLN positivity.
- Increase from 8.5% to 27.7% in patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have <5% SLN positive likelihood, with 98% NPV